Aristotle’s three modes of persuasion

As I was trying to come up with a topic for this week’s “choose-your-own” post, I tried to think about something that has been relevant in all my writing classes this semester. What has appeared over and over is Aristotle’s three persuasive appeals: ethos, logo, and pathos. Whoever is reading now has probably already heard about these appeals once, twice, or maybe too many times to count, but I find it interesting how they are always applicable to writing, so they are worth mentioning over and over again.

Ethos — the appeal to credibility and authority

Logos — the appeal to logic and reasoning 

Pathos — the appeal to emotions 

Whether it’s for a print document, something online, a presentation, and so on, these rhetorical appeals should often be considered when creating something to persuade an audience to do something. In my science writing course, I’ve had to consider the appeal in the articles I’ve analyzed. Are the stories clutching at my emotions or are they convincing me with their scientific evidence and credibility? In my visual rhetoric course, I have to ask myself how images are persuading the reader to do something. Is it ethos, logos, or pathos? Is it a combination?

From my limited experience in becoming more aware of these rhetorical strategies, I’ve noticed that many articles seem to really rely on pathos (emotions) and ethos (credibility). For example, with the LSS class project, I’ve definitely considered incorporating the appeals within the project, with special emphasis on pathos since LSS seems motivated by its emotional drive to reach out to the greater community.

When I look back at assignment topics I’ve chosen or interests I’ve pursued, I feel like I’m mostly interested in pathos, which leads me to think I may have a bit of a bias toward that appeal. I think this is good to be aware of so that I can check myself in order to balance the appeals to the audience’s needs and not my own. From what I’ve noticed so far is that many great pieces of work have a combination of the appeals, and some even have all three.

However, as many of us know, how something is written is often determined by what the content and purpose is and vice versa. For example, if I were to write a manual on putting out a fire, I probably wouldn’t make it into a lengthy book that makes the reader feel all sorts of emotions. However, if the material was on a heartfelt memoir about a retired firefighter, then pathos is most likely welcome and encouraged.

I think Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals also cross over to my internship. For example, the purpose, audience, and appeals the material has, need to be considered within a publishing house when pitching, creating, and selling a book. Publishing, as I have been discovering little by little, is much more complicated than I thought. Maybe I can write more about this next time.

As I continue to write, whether it’s for school or work, I will refer back to my rhetorical toolbox and perhaps see ethos, logos, and pathos on the top shelf.

 

Advertisements

6 Comments

  1. I would say pathos is the easiest of the three to employ, so it’s no wonder we use it so much! LSS does want us to use pathos plenty, but I think it would be important for us all to consider the other two. Really, ethos is pretty easy to incorporate, too. LSS is an established program that, from our on-sight meeting, we know to be very lively to say the least! This is something that should be highlighted somewhere somehow on our pages. Logos seems a bit harder, because different people respond to different lines of reasoning… Great post! Another tool to remember.

    Like

  2. Hey Christina,

    Great post this week! You gave me some really good insight and I seemed to have forgotten to evaluate these three methods to writing in our LSS project. I completely agree that LSS wants us to really focus in on the pathos and emotion of the project. But I do see areas where we can include logos and ethos. I see these two especially playing a role in our FAQ section. We are establishing our credibility and using logical questions and answers to meet the needs of our audience. Again, I really enjoyed your insight and can’t wait to see what we create as an end product for LSS!

    See you soon,
    Collin

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s